How Manly Is Your Skin Care Regimen?

metrosexual |ˌmetrōˈsekSHo͞oəl|

noun

a young, urban, heterosexual male with liberal political views, an interest in fashion, and a refined sense of taste.

       After reading the definition of metrosexual would you add anything? I have to be honest. I think the definition readily implies that a metrosexual often keeps up with his image. Particularly, their skin care regimen. I'm most interested in how societal gender norms impact the way we assume how individuals care for their skin. It may be stereotypical, but females are more widely expected to upkeep their appearance; buy expensive anti-aging products, get botox injections, succumb to the power of plastic surgery. However, the term metrosexual implies that our views have embraced a shift in ideology. The heterosexual man is no longer limited in his choice of skin care regimen. Although at first we may see this as a break in traditional gender norms, we must examine more closely. The definition also indicates that in order for this metrosexual man to upkeep his appearance, he must be "liberal", take an "interest in fashion", and have sophisticated "sense of taste". I believe that this creates a strong split between metrosexuals and non metrosexuals. It then becomes expected for a non metrosexual to shy away from "mangrooming" and stick to the old fashioned soap and water combination. In short, I posit that while women are wholly expected to adhere to a full skin care regimen, only certain types of men are socially accepted to follow a skin care regimen. Furthermore, the structure of skin care websites reveal how we think about skin care in terms of gender.
     
       For example, websites like Kiehl's and Clarins have specific directory tabs at the top of their website. There are categories such as "face", "body", "hair", and then "men". The tab for "face" is usually categorized by concerns and collections. Resultantly, skincare "concerns" create an ambiguity in who will use the product. However, men receive their own special tab. Most companies would argue that men tend to have a different skin type; they have more rapid oil production, have thicker skin, and are more prone to irritation from shaving. This allows for the development of appropriate products. I agree with this argument to an extent. However, in terms of moisture levels (oil production), not all men are oiler. I've seen some pretty dry skin for men from my experience. In my opinion, skin care should be based on skin concerns and needs and not based on gender. However, the reality is that men have been using soap and water for a long time. As a result, marketing and campaign strategies are fostered to capture the attention of men.

       For the company Kiehl's, the "Facial Fuel" line is a whirlwind of navy blue packaging, accompanied by visuals of airplanes and manly words such as "reenergizing" and "ultimate man". The biggest upward trend and potential market for new customers in skin care companies are men. However, I'm sure metrosexual men or men who always had a complete skin care regimen were already using products. They didn't need male friendly marketing to persuade them to use the products. This is significant because it shows that the skin care industry's efforts are to draw in the typical traditional heterosexual male. As smart as these campaigns may be in regards to business, they are certainly reenforcing societal gender norms.

       From my experience I've had countless interactions with male clients. There's a spectrum of skin care clients/consumers. The lowest rung on the ladder are those males who just wash their face in the shower with soap and water (St. Ives?). Then, the second rung are the males who have the basics down, cleanser and moisturizer. Next, the third rung entails a male who is willing to add in special products such as a toner, eye cream, or serum. Lastly, the ideal male customer for skin care companies is one that uses all products which cover a full skin care regimen, shave products and body products. It certainly takes persuasion and effort to work these clients up to the highest rung on the ladder. It's a challenge but it's not impossible.

       Skin care companies would probably also argue that men have a different lifestyle. They are always on the go and don't want to take the time to follow a detailed regimen. Is it because we view males as the breadwinners? It seems like we assume all males have a corporate job that starts at 8 am, in which they cannot possibly take time in the morning to wash their faces properly. I'm not a male, but yet my life is busy. I'm a student and a worker filled with class assignments and the desire to keep my life social. Yes, I follow a full skin care regimen and make time for facials. I think that lifestyle varies in term of the individual and not gender wise.

       In an ever changing world I think that this topic is definitely up for debate and discussion. It's also an effective way to really zero in on how to further market towards the male demographic. But keep in mind, how would these marketing campaigns look like in order to deplete such strict generalizations of females, males, and categories within men?

       

Once Upon A Time...

..."Organic food was just called food." 

                     ~Hunter Professor 

Flying down train escalators. Caffeine rushes. Familiar faces, foreign faces. Oh my.

Fall semester is here. There is always a mix of emotions floating around my head at the start of a new semester. It's a feeling of nostalgia for learning new ideas, theories and knowledge. Then panic briefly strikes at the thought of long tiring nights. The days will certainly pass by and the holidays will arrive in no time. I'm sure most students are concerned about how to keep up their energy. 

Our bodies are powerful engines. Yes, they can be fully energized. But, there needs to be the right conditions for our body to emit energy. I recently finished an enlightening self help book by Certified Nutritionist Kimberly Snyder called "The Beauty Detox Solution". Snyder unveils the simple truth of how food effects our digestion process. Our body can process fruits, vegetables and nuts a lot more quickly than starches and animal protein. The longer the digestion process more energy is required by the body to digest the food. Therefore, our bodies are hard at work leaving less time for the cells to carry out processes that can leave our skin glowing and maintain physical/mental energy. 

Why is it that we are so tired after eating large holiday meals? It's because we are most likely stuffing animal protein, starches, vegetables and dessert all in a matter of an hour. Our digestion system becomes clogged and our body is hard at work. Some call it the "itis"! 

Hopefully this semester you can tweak your eating habits to help you through those all nighters and finals. Try to follow these simple philosophies.

• Before a meal eat your fruits and vegetables first so your stomach can easily absorb its nutrients
• For efficient digestion pair animal protein (beef, chicken, fish) with vegetables/fruits, if you decide to eat starches/carbs (pasta, bread, grains) also eat it along with vegetables/fruits
• Try to avoid eating starches/carbs and animal protein together, it's a full blown workout for the digestive system!
• Hydrate throughout the day, add lemon, don't drink it all at once or else you will have to pee often
• Try a B Multi vitamin (time released) to sustain mental energy throughout the day 
• Incorporate probiotic pills for a delivery of good bacteria in the stomach 
• Take enzyme capsules or drink Kombucha to help aid the digestive flow 

Remember, efficient and easy digestive flow with yield more mental/physical energy!

First Time Experience at an All-Inclusive

Vacations are meant to be a change of scenery and routines. Recently I spent a week in Punta Cana, I enjoyed the gorgeous beaches and refreshing pool with my boyfriend and friends. My mind felt at peace while I felt the motion of the waves in the Ocean. However, it was certainly a challenge to upkeep my eating habits. The resort was all inclusive meaning unlimited choices of food. I managed to eat my fruits and vegetables, guzzle lots of water and stick to small portions. The downside about the food is that you can definitely tell everything is drenched in sauces and tons of salt to ensure good taste. My stomach was not used to all the added stuff on top of my vegetables. 

I do admit that I am a crazy sweet tooth. I couldn't help but try the desserts because I knew it would be regretted. Also, the all you can drink part of the package only added to my bloated feeling. No one is perfect including myself. Coming home I really felt like crap. My stomach was bulging and I felt sluggish. I truly missed the way I ate when at home. For next time, I would want to only stick to dessert once a day and limit myself to only two drinks a day. 

As I'm writing this I'm enjoying a wonderful snack of carrots and a tbsp of hummus. Oh how I've missed eating healthily :) 

How To Get Back Into the Healthy Groove Post-Vacation

• Remind yourself of the feelings that good eating brings to your body
• Drink plenty of water, and add lemon to bring down bloating
• Eat lightly 
• Eat fruits and vegetables that contain lots of water (watermelon, lettuce) to alleviate bloating 
• Go for a run, dance to your favorite music or hit the gym to get your metabolism up 
• Nourish your body with an exfoliating wash
• Rehydrate your face with a yogurt, honey, and brown sugar scrub  

Mind Game: Rethink the Fried Chicken

The whole train cart reeked of fried chicken. Directly across from me a large women chomped on her Popeye's drumstick. My first reaction...damn, that smells good. However on second thought it was truly repulsive. She seemed to mindlessly intake the fried chicken like a zombie. Perhaps she had a bad day or could only afford Popeyes, but it kept me thinking about how psychological eating choices are. 

Making constant healthy eating choices is definitely a habit I have worked towards and struggle to maintain. Lately I've noticed that when I wake up in the morning and pop open my fridge I actually demonstrate conscience thought. Yes, my eyes are still heavy with tiredness but I truly ponder about what foods are going to respect my body. What foods are going to deliver antioxidants, keep me full but not bloated, boost up my metabolism and energy levels? 

I think this is  habit is worthy for everyone to try. Even if you just start at breakfast. Pause and evaluate what foods are going to really be beneficial for your health. 

Fav Workout Move of the Week

I guarantee this will totally make a difference in your ab workout routine.

Don't forget those side abs ! 

You can moderate this move by either taking out the dumbbell that is supporting your stance. Or, if you feel wobbly at first, just hold the pose to find your balance. Then, add the weights. 

Taken from: Women's Health Magazine, June 2012

Lunches, Vending Machines, Bake Sales-Oh My!

           “Their idea of improved nutrition is a healthier donut,” my mother exclaimed, while we discussed public school nutrition.

            As a graduate of the public school education system, my mother and I know firsthand the horrid food choices that are available for students. Michelle Obama is also aware of the poorly enforced school lunches after she discovered, “mystery meat slathered with syrupy brown sauce, served with a brown whole wheat role and a salad no kids touched, and chocolate milk” was served as a meal considered to be up to “USDA standard” (Julian 50). Not only does this quote describe a repulsive meal but it also unveils how vegetables are not highly valued for many children. I believe that in the US, the educational setting is contributing to childhood obesity through subsidized school lunches, quick sugary snacks and beverages in vending machines, and excessive amounts of bake sales. Furthermore, it would be beneficial to examine the history of school lunch programs in order to understand the current concerns over available meals.

            Subsidized school lunch dates back to President Franklin Roosevelt’s era. Roosevelt developed farm-subsidized programs during the Great Depression to ensure food distribution to those in need (Julian 46). The subsidized food programs eventually passed on to the United States Department of Agriculture. The USDA controls a vast public school food program which in the “2008-09 school year, over 31 million American children ate a federally subsidized school lunch, and more than 19 million of them paid either a reduced price or nothing for their food” (Julian 46). This staggering fact emphasizes the USDA’s crucial role in bringing food to the low-income households.

Although the USDA’s school lunch program is affordable, nutritionists are wary of its health standards. Janice Poppendieck author of, Free For All, explains the politics behind USDA subsidized school lunches:

“The focus was on using the available foods, not on a balanced diet. The USDA staff who developed these regulations did not think they were setting up the parameters for a permanent national school food program. They had commodities; they needed a morally and politically acceptable outlet, and they established rules and procedures that reflected their farm income agenda. In fact, regulations they established set the tone and structure for the program and have endures, in updated form, until the present” (Julian 47).

Poppendieck’s explanation is useful because she highlights the “established rules and procedures that reflected their farm income agenda” as the underlying factor for why the USDA focuses on affordability as opposed to health (Julian 47). She effectively argues that these subsidized food programs were formed originally to distribute produce in response to poverty during the Great Depression. Although poverty is not as prevalent today in comparison to the Great Depression, it is fair to say that public schools do face economic issues.

            In Public School 295 in Sunset Park, Brooklyn the asking price for a cupcake increased from $0.50 to $1.00 (Spencer 1). This sudden change of price set off a controversy among parents of lower income households. It is vital to recognize that a broad range of median household income in areas of public schools such as P.S. 295, which jumped from $34,878 to $64,184 in a matter of ten years (Spencer 1). This leaves “asking price” as a sensitive topic for those who can’t afford it.

Carmen Reyes, P.S./I.S 180 PTA president, is familiar with such cases that involve students who cannot afford certain fundraising activities. Reyes was confronted by students who could not afford to spend $20 on unlimited food and drink bracelets (Spencer 2). The PTA president formulated a compromise, which allowed the students to decorate in exchange for the bracelets. This example is significant because it demonstrates cases in which families are unable to afford fundraiser prices. Fundraisers reveal the financial troubles that many families face. USDA subsidized food programs prove to be of importance to families who rely on it. Despite major budget cuts in the public schools the USDA’s subsidized program remains stable.

To combat city budget cuts, classic forms of fundraising-such as bake sales-have become the quick way to rack in cash. Due to the USDA’s past lack of nutritional value, New York City public schools developed a culture that embraces the enticing appeal of mouthwatering fatty foods. Bake sales are central to the public school education system in two ways; firstly it fits the culture and secondly it generates cash fast. However, with the rise of obesity, these readily available bake sales are only contributing to the disease.

The possibility of banning bake sales would only ignite controversy. Perhaps, outraged parents might express the ban on bake sales as too limiting. Often times, Americans repudiate government intervention because they believe it violates their “freedom”. The Healthy, Hunger-free act calls for more government action to help improve the quality of school lunches (Pear).

Some critics such as Representative Paul Broun, Republican of Georgia and physician greatly disagree with the recently passed act:

“This bill is not about child nutrition. It’s not about healthy kids. It’s about an expansion of the federal government, more and more control from Washington, borrowing more money and putting our children in greater debt. The federal government has no business setting nutritional standards and telling families what they should and should not eat” (Pear).

Although Mr. Broun does not concede with government influence over nutritional standards, it would be hard for him to avoid alarming facts. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “one in every five children are obese” (Nixon 1). It seems unbelievable that Mr. Broun should be in resistance of nutritional guidance, especially when faced with a national issue of obesity. Federal government control is important when it comes to large-scale change. The idea of families being told, “what they should and should not eat” is not a matter of control but an issue of positive macro scale change (Pear). Although I believe the federal government should induce nutritional change, I also insist that change occur from private companies.

            Consider the study conducted by the National Academy of Sciences, which estimated that, “about $2.3 billion worth of snack foods and beverages are sold annually in schools nationwide” in vending machines (Nixon 1). This fact indicates that these goodies sold are popular choices among children, unlike the salad bar. Gary Hirshberg the CEO of Stonyfield Farm sarcastically remarked, “I wasn’t aware Skittles was a food group”, in disgust at the choices in vending machines (Tyre and Sarah). In response, Hirshberg created a healthier vending machine for schools. Such items included were yogurt smoothies, fruit leathers, and whole-wheat pretzels (Tyre and Sarah). Alongside the Stonyfield’s CEO is Christopher Gindlesperger, director of communications for the American Beverage Association, has exercised his power to help schools eliminate sugary drinks and replace them with healthier options (Nixon 2). Despite Hirshberg and Gindlesperger’s efforts, their alternatives do not profit as greatly compared to the old food options. However, their efforts are evidence that big corporations are willing to help fight growing obesity.

Action from big corporations to reduce obesity is certainly necessary. The Journal of The Royal Institute of Public Health conducted a statistical study, which concluded, “Surrounding food outlets could also lower the effectiveness of health education in the classroom by setting a highly visible example that counters educational messages” (Sturm 689). This highlights the threatening effect food businesses can impose on school efforts to induce nutritional change. Moreover, a team of researchers examined the association between food environment and obesity based on walkability in New York City. Their published work in “Environment Health Perspectives” reaches many interesting conclusions such as a link between BMI healthy food outlets and lower average mean BMIs (Rundle et al. 445). This suggests that people who live in areas that have healthier options are more likely to incorporate nutritious foods into their diet. In addition, the study identified neighborhood income and race/ethnicity as prevalent variables. For example, low densities of healthy food outlets were most common in poor and predominantly Black/Hispanic neighborhoods (Rundle et al. 445). Overall, both studies support the argument that surrounding environments can truly impact diet. More importantly, public schools do reside in areas of low volume healthy outlets.

Up to this point, I have unpacked the history of school lunch programs that emulate two vital arguments. On the one hand, the USDA designed the subsidized meals to favor surplus of crops over nutritional value. As a consequence, many public schools have developed fundraisers such as bake sales that have questionable nutritional value. Unfortunately, poor food choices are also reinforced through vending machines. Socioeconomic conditions play a role in obesity as well. McDonalds, home of the over processed hamburger, is an example of private corporations that can reverse the effects of nutritional education taught in schools. In order to combat growing obesity trends, a valid solution would need to be mindful of affordability and promote fun ways to embrace healthy food/snack options.

            Consider The Wellness in Schools organization, which runs the Cook For Kids program. The program teaches both students and teachers the importance of locally and seasonally grown produce. Then, the program branches out into the fundamentals of cooking. To raise funds, Wellness in Schools paired up with over 40 restaurants to help raise funds for the organization. For example, couples could attend a Valentine’s Day cooking class at the Culinary Loft for $150 per person (Fabricant 1). Or others could participate in free seminars at Brooklyn Wine Exchange and enjoy two free drinks (Fabricant 1). At the end of the event each participating restaurant provided a voluntary donation card. There is a range of options available for those willing to spend a lot, a little, or no money at events. This availability of financial choice will be able to involve all income levels. Even further, the suggested donation card alleviates financial pressure. Although I advocate the financial choice supported in Wellness in School’s fundraising, I do not concede with the content of the all of the events. For example, one of the restaurants hosted an all you can eat chicken wing competition (Fabricant 1). The idea of consuming unnecessary amounts of chicken wings is not an ideal healthy choice.

My advocacy for New York City public school fundraisers to maintain affordability and nutrition could be possible if two guidelines are followed. The first, to offer several price options for event charges/admissions which families can choose from. Or, if students receive reduced lunch, this can serve as an indicator for qualification for reduced admission charge. Alongside affordability, fundraising events should embrace an opportunity to creatively incorporate nutritional value.  Perhaps one solution may be to provide several healthy modified international food cooking classes. Parents who want to volunteer their time could run these cooking classes. Then, after the classes are done families can donate as much as they would like to the school. This is a great way for all the families to become involved regardless of economic background. For those who do not want to donate, they can still participate in just teaching the cooking class. Although the end donation is just optional, the families who want to donate can offer an amount they are comfortable with. The international dishes will be required to reflect a balanced diet; the plate should be ½ filled with fruits and vegetables, ¼ of whole grains, and ¼ healthy protein. Overall, New York City public schools should work towards better health for their students while maintaining a mindful attitude of financial variability.

When I envision nutritional changes in public schools I certainly do not believe a “healthier donut” is the answer. This paper has allowed me to explore several contributing factors to obesity. The historical background of the USDA’s school lunch program explains the triumph of crop surplus over nutritional balance. Although this ideal worked well during the early 1900s, Americans are now faced with the issue of obesity. In addition, vending machines stocked with sugary snacks and beverages are easily accessible to many students. Also, depending on the school’s location there may be low densities of healthy food outlets. Even further, the popular bake sale fundraiser is as addictive as sugar. To break this addiction school’s need to creatively reform fundraisers to include all economic classes. However, more importantly a healthy balanced meal should receive the attention it deserves. Hopefully others can realize the contribution of USDA subsidized lunches, vending machines, and bake sales have on obesity in public schools and work towards solutions.

Works Cited

Fabricant, Florence. "Calendar." LexisNexis Academic. LexisNexis, 9 Feb. 2011. Web. 5 Apr. 2012.

Julian, Liam. "Why School Lunch Is "Nasty!"" Policy Review (2010): 43-53. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17 Apr. 2012.

Neckerman, Kathryn M. "Disparities in the Food Environments of New York City Public Schools." Academic Journal of Preventative Medicine 39.3 (2010): 195-202.SciVerse ScienceDirect. 18 Jan. 2008. Web. 17 Apr. 2012.

Nixon, Ron. "New Guidelines Planned on School Vending Machines." New York Times 21 Feb. 2012: A11. New York Times. 20 Feb. 2012. Web. 25 Mar. 2012. <www.newyorktimes.com>.

Pear, Robert. "Congress Approves Child Nutrition Bill." New York Times. 2 Dec. 2010. Web. <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/03/us/politics/03child.html>.

Perez-Pena, Richard. "Obesity on Rise in New York Public Schools." New York Times. 3 July 2003. Web. <http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/09/nyregion/obesity-on-rise-in-new-york-public-schools.html>.

Rundle, Andrew, Kathryn Neckerman, Lance Freeman, Gina S. Lovasi, Marnie Purciel, James Quinn, Catherine Richards, Neelanjan Sircar, and Christopher Weiss. "Neighborhood Food Environment and Walkability Predict Obesity in New York City." JSTOR. JSTOR, 05 June 2012. Web. 6 May 2012. <http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/25472610?uid=3739832&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=56146003023>.

Sanjek, Roger. "Color-Full before Color Blind: The Emergence of Multiracial Neighborhood Politics in Queens." American Anthropologist 102.4 (2000): 762-72. Print.

Spencer, Kyle. "'It's Never Just About The Cupcake'" New York Times 18 Mar. 2012, MB sec. LexisNexis Academic. Web. 17 Apr. 2012.

Tygre, Peg, and Sarah Staveley-O'-carroll. "How to Fix School Lunch." Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 7 May 2012. <http://web.ebscohost.com.proxy.wexler.hunter.cuny.edu/ehost/detail?sid=b91097ff-a028-4233-940d-6e3cab6278ab%40sessionmgr110&vid=4&hid=108&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=17781036>.

Dualism of the Gender/Sex System

Hey All, I just wanted to share an essay I had to write for my Intro to Gender & Sexuality Studies class. This class is super interesting to me especially issues related to the body. 

The train jolted, causing my body to slide along the plastic bench. A domino effect ensued as the man next to me pushed against my thigh. From the corner of my eye I noticed his legs were as wide as an obtuse triangle.

“He thinks he owns this bench!” I had thought to myself.  As I fixed the collar of my jacket, I opened my legs just as wide. There, now we were equal. Is gender discrimination derived from the ways in which females and males are expected to move their bodies?

Iris Marion Young provides insight regarding the female use of body movement, “Reflection on feminine comportment and body movement in other physical activities reveals that these also are frequently characterized, much as in the throwing case, by a failure to make full use of the body’s spatial and lateral potentialities” (Young, p.142). In other words, Young suggests that when most women participate in physical activity they often do not utilize space surrounding the body. It is important to recognize that throughout the history of sports there has always been a dividing binary classification between male and female competing grounds. Young’s distinction of bodily spatial movement is not an effective explanation for current gender discrimination and controversy in sports today. In this paper I argue gender discrimination and controversy that women face in sports today develops from cultural differences and increasing complication of gender due to science; both which challenge rigid feminine and masculine identities. The story of Caster Semenya provides much insight regarding how racial, scientific and societal norms triggered the outbreak of the gender controversy that surrounded her.

Leonard Chuene, a member of Athletics South Africa prominently states, “We are not going to allow Europeans to define and describe our children” (Levy p.4). Caster’s masculine qualities triggered the outbreak of gender controversy. Her fellow South African citizens compare her gender situation with the South African woman Saartjie Baartman who was similarly ridiculed by foreigners for her unique body. This comparison that the citizens of South Africa have drawn suggest that foreigners have a tendency to alienate the female black body (Levy p.4). This is because Caster and Saartjie’s appearance do not fit societal feminine identity norms.

The consequence of rigid feminine and masculine identities caused Castor’s female competitors to adopt discriminatory attitudes. In reference to Chuene’s statement there is a cultural difference between European and South African views. Competitor Elisa Cusma of Italy announces, “For me, she is not a women. She is a man.”  And Mariya Savino of Russia exclaims, “Just look at her.”  (Levy p.3). These European female competitors create an issue of doubt, which contribute to the gender controversy. It is reassuring to know that the South African Minister of Women, Children and Person with Disabilities is in support of Castor. They see this alienation of Castor as a violation of human rights. The judgmental attitudes towards Castor’s appearance stem from deeply engrained qualities of femininity. As a result, this shapes a dichotomous view between males and females.

Castor’s seemingly masculine appearance threatens the dichotomous nature of gender. Throughout the history of sports science has played a pivotal role in fostering societal gender norms. The method of genital inspection was utilized to determine gender. That method was replaced with chromosomal testing. Eventually, science uncovered a biological explanation regarding the phenomena of intersexes causing chromosomal testing to seem invalid. Even further, knowledge of an intersexed person weakens the argument of those who do not view Caster as a female because of her appearance. In current scientific advances it is clear that 1.7% of the population “deviates from the standard definition of male or female” according to Fausto-Sterling (Levy p.7).  This implies that from a biological point of view there is not always either male or female. Although science tugs at the stiff boundaries that classify gender, it remains difficult to shatter gender norm ideologies passed on throughout human development.

Upon returning to Young’s statement it is important to understand that she believed the way in which boys and girls learned how to utilize their body in relation to space opened the door for gender discrimination. Caster Semenya’s struggle in the sports world unveils how cultural differences and advances in science are the real underlying factors in gender discrimination. Within South African culture, discrimination in sports is not tolerated South Africans defended Caster’s human rights because they know that in the past foreigners have oppressed the bodies of black women. This cultural difference also highlights the dichotomous nature between male and female identities. Science has certainly impacted the sports world’s procedures for competition placement based on gender. Scientific research and explanation of intersex serves as a new outlook regarding gender. Gender can be placed on a spectrum not a strict binary class system. Unfortunately, the gender discrimination that evolved from cultural differences and the world’s once basic understanding of biology have casted a shadow over Caster Semenya’s accomplishments. Now it is up to the sports world to create an environment where talent is the focus of the competition, not the type of genitals that are hiding within an athlete’s pants.

Works Cited

Levy, Ariel. "Either/Or Sports, sex, and the case of Caster Semenya." 30 Nov 2009: 1-13. Print.

Young, Iris Marion. Throwing like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment Motility and Spatiality. 2nd ed. 3. Springer, 1980. 137-156. Print.

Didn't Your Parents Ever Tell You To Eat Your Vegetables?

I came across this article which offers great advice on how to raise your kids with nutritional values:

http://www.girlstalk.com/blog/2012/02/27/raising-healthy-eaters/

My favorite portion of the article was as follows:

Start separating. Many kids like separation of various foods on their plates. They often don’t do well with casseroles initially. Try to keep their portions small and praise them for trying new foods, even if they don’t want more. It’s a process, not a race.

Teaching children to pick and eat healthier food can be like a roller coaster. One minute your child likes the food, the next minute they don’t even want to look at it. It will be an easier process if the parents are consuming nutritious options, or at least trying for the sake of their child. It’s definitely not going to be easy if you’re on one side of the table eating the same foods and your child is told to eat something entirely different. Children are always curious about what their parents are eating.

Consuming the same healthy meals as your child will help them to become more confident in what you’re saying. They will start to think that the food must be healthy because their mom or dad is eating it too. So whenever you’re having a family day out, bring a cooler with healthy options for the entire family. That way no one will be tempted to order less nutritional fare.

The author, Jasmine Burroughs highlights the importance of setting the example for children; eating the same foods they would be encouraged to eat. Even better, Burroughs suggests that foods shouldn't be too mashed together like a "casserole"; this makes it hard to determine which foods the child likes and dislikes. 

I take interest in this article also because it seems to coincide with my Human Development Psychology class. We were asked to create a preschool curriculum that reflects the ideals and practices of Jeanne Piaget. Piaget emphasizes the cultivation of early childhood development through social interaction among children. I, of course, decided to be in charge of the health and nutrition activities for the group project. So wouldn't it be great if children could learn at a young age how to have a balanced diet? I utilized the healthy eating plate from my previous blogposts to use as a model for the imaginary students to mock. The activity would go something like this...

The children get crayons. They use their crayons to divide up their plates into "vegetables" "fruits" "whole grains" and "healthy protein". Then, they would venture off to tables that were setup to have these four categories. Using their model, they would have to load up on the foods for the certain designated areas on their plates. Of course, I imagine preschoolers might be messy, probably whiny and at times uncooperative.  But hey, it's worth a try. It would take a lot more than one try to have these children get into the habit of a balanced diet. 

Hopefully schools will become more increasingly on board with valuing balanced diets. I'm currently doing a research essay relative to this topic. So stay tuned :)

Don't Skimp on Your Skin!

Over the past two months I've had the opportunity through my job to really understand what healthy skin is. Our skin is so complex and comprised of hundreds of layers, pores and follicles. Being that the skin is complex, it becomes to difficult to manage throughout our lifetime. Our soft and flawless skin only lasts up until puberty and then our hormones certainly interrupt the balance. Not only do hormones play a large part in how our skin acts but outside aggressors and genetics are involved as well. 

What outside agressors can irritate the skin? UV rays, flying debris, bacteria, climate.

Why do we get blemishes? Stress, overproduction of sebum in the oil glands, large pores that collect bacteria.

Why do lines/wrinkles develop? The skin naturally becomes dehydrated over time, thus the skin loses it's elasticity and forms visible signs of aging. 

What skin types are there? Normal skin (no visible pores, smooth texture), Oily skin (noticeable pores, uneven texture), Dry skin (no visible pores, dull, flaky) 

Unfortunately the environment and our genetics mesh to create our skin type. The goal is to find key products that are of quality in order to achieve a healthy skin barrier. A healthy skin barrier is comprised of healthy skin cells that can reject outside aggressors and lock in essential moisture and oils. Paying attention to your skin is a key aspect in determining your skin type. Once you know your skin type then the right products can be chosen.

Any good skin care regime should consist of a cleanser, toner and moisturizer/cream. A cleanser washes away the debris and bacteria. A toner sweeps away any leftover cleanser, balances the ph level of the skin (oil-water levels), and preps the skin to lock in essential moisture and oils. Lastly, a moisturizer/cream protects the skin throughout the day or night. Keep in mind this is a basic skincare regime. Prevention is the best way to reduce UV damage and aging. Any moisturizer or cream with SPF will block out the UV rays. Products that promote prevention of fine lines and wrinkles are also a good way to slow down the aging process. 

What are some great add ons to really keep skin healthy? 

Use a clay mask once a week helps to extract any toxins and debris deep within the pores.

Exfoliate up to three times a week to shed dead skin cells. 

Add concern specific serums to your skincare regime right before any moisturizer/cream.

Love the skin you're in.

Please feel free to ask me any questions!

After Gym Protein Shake

There are so many different options for added Protein powder! Take a look in a local health store and find the right amount and flavor you would like.

I use a strawberry Designer Whey that contains 18g of protein.

All you will need is a blender! And then...

1 scoop of Whey Protein
1 cup of yogurt-any flavor or brand (I use weight watchers vanilla)
1 banana
1/2 cup of blueberries
Cinnamon
Small squirt of Hershey's Chocolate Syrup

Feel free to get creative, add whatever fruits you have available and keep it fun with a hint of sweetness :)

New Year Update

Hello all :) 

So far it's been about two weeks since I've been hitting the gym at New York Sports Club! Last year I got on track with my eating habits, so this year my goal is to balance eating healthy and working out. The best part about working out on my own is that I can control how frequent and how much I do at the gym. Right now I'm going three times a week for an hour and a half each time. 

What's a typical gym day like? I love to start out with cardio, adding speed and incline along the way. Then, I make sure to stretch to prepare for weight lifting and circuits. In the last two weeks I've definitely noticed an improvement in the number of reps I can handle and the longer I can hold a pose. 

Also, I've started to add protein shakes into my diet to help build muscle faster. Stay tuned for my progress and upcoming routines that I use at the gym!

New Year, New President.

Welcome in 2012! At the start of a every new year millions of people attempt to dedicate themselves to new goals and resolutions; new diets, new workouts, new jobs. Of course I've reconciled with myself to keep to my good eating habits and I even joined a gym to make working out a priority. But there's another thing on my mind for the new year. Who will I vote for in the 2012 election? Yes, it's my first time I'll be able to vote! 

Let's face it, politics is a sensitive subject.  So is abortion. 

I came across an article written by actress Maggie Gyllenhaal in the February 2012 edition of Glamour. Within the article she raises awareness regarding the attacks that many of the 2012 candidates have been making on Planned Parenthood. Gyllenhaal expressed her support for the Planned Parenthood Action Fund organization; providing a website for further information, http://www.womenarewatching.org/. 

As I explored the website it hit me! My resolution for this year is to pick the best candidate based on their  views of healthcare. On the website, clips were posted of Mitt Romney, Rick Santorium and Newt Gingrich all supporting abortion rights and "life at conception". On the flipside, President Obama supports Planned Parenthood and greater access to pap smears, hpv vaccinations, birth control and sex education. 

For those Americans and presidential candidates who support the idea of "life at conception", I see your point. Yes, we are all required to take biology and learn that when the sperm and egg colide, a fetus develops. It seems selfish and barbaric to terminate potential life to live our own life. But doesn't it also seems selfish and barbaric for those 2012 candidates who also produce vicious commercials of their opponents? Let's get real. 

Why should Americans support Planned Parenthood? We need to ensure that women can achieve a healthy lifestyle; both physically and mentally. The Affordable Care Act does so for women's healthcare. If we take away affordable medical needs then we are downgrading the quality of life for many women. Is that what we want for this country? To make affordable healthcare only for the rich? The key ingredient that Planned Parenthood provides is preventative care such as birth control, sex education and pap tests. Point blank, Planned Parenthood creates an equal opportunity for all women. Let's fight for equality. 

It definitely worthwhile to get informed about the stance that Republicans and Democrats are taking this year regarding women's healthcare access. Their views say a lot about how they want to run this country and how much they really care about affordable healthcare access. Feel free to voice your opinion on my blog or even dispute my words. Everyone has a right to a say!